Welcome to the first newsletter for the Vaccination Decisions website. I feel it is necessary to present the public with the evidence I have researched over 8 years at university because it is clear that vaccination is being promoted to the public on incomplete science. The government claims that vaccinations are ‘safe and effective’ but this claim can be made from 2 positions:
1. Based upon observed empirical evidence or
2. A lack of evidence because the government has not funded the research that would prove the causal links and frequency of adverse events linked to vaccines.
It is clear that the government is making this claim from the second position: a lack of evidence. The government has not funded a study that observes the combination of 12 vaccines in animals or infants over a period of 5 – 10 years. This study is essential because the chemicals in the vaccine carrier have known links with delayed adverse events such as allergies, hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis and autoimmune diseases. It is also essential because the chemicals in vaccines have synergistic and cumulative effects. This means they can react together to increase the toxicity and/or they accumulate in the body over time to increase the toxicity. If the government has not funded this research, as it has not, then its claim that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ is not based upon evidence. That is, the current immunization policy is not an evidence-based policy.
The government website has not provided a link to the ingredients of the Australian schedule of vaccines so I have used the website of the most prominent authority on this topic – the US CDC. I have also included the WAVE website for a comparison of the information. The brands of vaccines used in Australia can be found on these websites (Welcome page).
For the past 4 decades vaccines have been introduced for infectious diseases that became a small risk to individuals prior to vaccines being used. The government continues to add vaccines to the recommended schedule even though the majority of individuals are not at significant risk from these diseases – now 16 vaccines. As there is an increased risk of harm with each vaccine (drug) injected it is important to know what is in a vaccine and how many should be used in developing infants with different genetics. The risk of any disease or vaccine is different for each individual.
There are 2 pro-vaccine positions that can be taken on this issue:
Individuals must use all the vaccines recommended by the government enforced by links to tax benefits/work placements or
Individuals have a right to choose the number of vaccines used in themselves and their children.
This website provides scientific-evidence for the 2nd position – our right to choose how many vaccines we use. This is a human rights issue and in an age when vaccines are continually being introduced for diseases that are not at epidemic levels it is time for the public to be involved in the decision-making process. Vaccines are described by the CDC as ‘unavoidably unsafe’ and combining vaccines in infants or adult bodies has never been tested in controlled clinical trials. Population health is at risk if the public does not get involved in this debate.
I hope you will discuss this information with health professionals as well as friends and relatives. Please feel free to contact me to make suggestions about the type of information you would like to receive in future newsletters.
