3 May 2021
Here is a referenced document that describes the risk of taking the experimental COVID19 injections – No Jab For Me This document also explains why healthy people and those with mild flu symptoms, should not be screened with the RT-PCR test. This is not a diagnostic tool. Hence, it is unable to diagnose COVID19 disease, or inform of any risk, in asymptomatic people. Further, it is not specific to novel coronavirus 2019. It identifies the family of coronaviruses. This screening test is not identifying asymptomatic cases of COVID19 and the case and death statistics are fraudulent.
In 2020 the health department was using the PCR test at 40-45 cycle threshold and it is known that this amplification produces 100% false positives. In January 2021, at the same time as the COVID19 vaccines were implemented, the WHO admitted that the amplifications were too high and in 2021 the health department is using CT’s of 25 +. This plus a reduction in surveillance of the healthy population (less testing by the government) results in an immediate reduction in cases. This reduction is now being attributed to the experimental jabs even though it is admitted that vaccinated people are still testing positive for COVID19 disease.
Here is a letter from the lawyers at People for Safe Vaccines (P4SV) that can be used to decline the COVID19 vaccine. If you need legal assistance with declining a COVID vaccine please become a member of P4SV and you will get access to the lawyers.
On the 20 August 2020 lawyer, Serene Teffaha, wrote a letter to all Australian state premiers demanding that they remove the unlawful and immoral directive for visitors and healthcare workers to get vaccinated in order to enter aged-care facilities.
In this letter Serene reveals the false information that is being used to remove human rights in Australia under these emergency directives: directives that have been designed by the GAVI alliance (corporate partnerships) that advise the World Health Organisation. The letter describes the fact that the laboratory tests being used to identify SARSCov-2 are not diagnostic tools – that is they cannot provide proof that this virus is present in these cases or deaths.
The tests are also non-specific tests that cannot identify different strains of coronavirus. They only inform that a person has been exposed to the family of coronaviruses that cause the common cold. Many healthy people will test positive to this test and it is also known that it has a high rate of false positives. Here is a link to this open letter:
On 18 August 2020 London Real released PLANDEMIC Part 2: Indoctrination. This is a must see expose of the fraud in the media reporting of the 2020 planned coronavirus ‘pandemic’. To understand the fraud in the scientific claims about this planned event please watch and share Plandemic Parts 1 and 2 and Serene Teffaha’s letter to the government that describes the lack of proof of causality in any of the deaths and cases that are labelled ‘COVID19″.
COVID19 Engineered in China Lab: Effective Vaccine unlikely – Renowned Italian Scientist, Professor Giuseppe Tritto, states on 10 August that the virus was genetically-engineered in a lab in Wuhan, China.
Mainstream Media and Science Expose COVID-19 as a Hoax – On the 11 August 2020 this 6 min video was released describing how the COVID19 Pandemic was manipulated.
The Significant Events for Creating a Global Pandemic to Control the Outcome – Dr. Judy Wilyman. On 25 August 2020 I made this 20 min video to show how this pLandemic has been manipulated and the link to mandating the flu vaccine in aged-care facilities.
Global Medical Tyranny – Dr. Judy Wilyman – On 27 August 2020 I made this video after a request to provide a 7 min contribution to the UK protest on Saturday 29 August 2020.
CDC: There is no Pandemic – On 4 September 2020 the CDC’s own statistics were quoted to state that there is no pandemic and Australia’s statistics also support this claim.
Australian Anti-Lockdown Rallies 5th September 2020 – Dr. Judy Wilyman speaks in Perth – 20 min speech on the steps of Parliament House.
COVID19 Fact Sheet
Here is a COVID19 Fact Sheet that explains the deceptive way in which COVID19 is being diagnosed as a new inluenza-like disease in the population that is causing death in the (mostly) elderly population. All deaths in Australia (~80 deaths from February to May) to date have been with co-morbidity (that is, underlying health issues that in other years would have been labelled as the main cause of death).
In 2020 coronavirus has been re-classified as a ’cause of death’. Coronaviruses cause the common cold which have ‘flu-like symptoms’ and people generally die of a complication to flu/colds – not from the virus itself. The Novel Coronavirus 2019 (a new mutated strain of common coronaviruses also named SARSCov2) is now being claimed as the cause of death for people with lung edema, pneumonia, strokes, chronic heart disease, liver disease and cancers etc.
This is despite the fact that the virus itself has not been isolated from any of the deaths/cases labelled as COVID19 disease – Global Research Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for any Strain , not Specifically for the COVID19 strain.
Here are the latest COVID19 and Influenza death and case statistics for August 2020. It is interesting to note that influenza statistics for 2020 dropped in March this year to almost zero at the same time as deaths to COVID19 started to increase. Did you know that diagnosis in the majority of COVID19 cases is being based on clinical symptoms only? That is, without any confirmation that the SARSCov2 virus is actually present. This is called a clinical diagnosis and causality is not proven with laboratory confirmation in these cases/deaths.
It is not economical to attempt to isolate the actual purified virus to prove causality so doctors are using clinical diagnosis (flu-like symptoms) and tests such as the RT-PCR test and serology/antibody tests that cannot identify the specific strain of coronavirus, SARSCov2, that is claimed to be causing this new disease – ‘COVID19’. These tests are not diagnostic tests and they cannot distinguish between the family of coronavirus strains that make up 7-15% of respiratory viruses.
This fact reveals the lie that the government has told about immunity to this new virus. People will have some immunity to this new strain of coronavirus because it is a common family of viruses. In addition, the only way to enhance the immunity in the population is exposure to the natural virus which is mild for 99% of the population. This is why lockdowns and social distancing are not based on scientific evidence.
There is no laboratory test that is being used to identify SARSCov2 in the cases/deaths of this new disease. This is significant because the symptoms that are being used to diagnose the disease can be caused by many viruses, bacteria and non-infectious agents as well.
In Australia when the government was recently asked under the Freedom of Information Act to provide “a document that shows there is a test that 100% positively identifies the causal agent, SARSCov2, and not other coronaviruses” the government response was “no relevant documents have been located”.
The Canadian community received a similar response in their FOI request for proof of causality. No test exists that specifically identifies SARSCov2 and not the family of coronaviruses.
The fact that COVID19 and SARSCov2 (the new mutated coronavirus strain) are not legally, scientifically or medically recognised as a disease or a virus, means that it cannot be legislated against and therefore the Coronavirus Act 2020 is Null and Void as stated in this legal action being taken in the UK.
The Canadian community is also taking its government to court for illegally bringing in lockdown measures and social distancing when the impact of this new strain of coronavirus has been no greater than a normal strong influenza season – Swiss Policy Research: Facts about COVID-19.
On 11 March 2020 the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared a ‘global pandemic’ of this new virus called Novel 2019 Corronavirus (or SARSCov2) even though it had no knowledge of the transimissiblity or the pathogenicity of this virus in all countries at this time. These factors will vary significantly in developed and developing countries due to environmental conditions.
By 19 March 2020 the UK government / Public Health England had downgraded this virus to a disease that was no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID). In Australia there are no HCID’s listed on the national notifiable disease list. That is, the SARSCov2 virus that is stated to be a ‘global pandemic’ is not listed on Australia’s National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS).
This is why it was inappropriate for countries to use social distancing and lockdown measures in the healthy population based only on mathematical modelling that did not use real data from each country to assess the risk from this new mutated virus.
Influenza/corona viruses mutate every year and our bodies develop immunity. This was a mutated coronavirus and 7-15% of influenza viruses are coronaviruses so we have some immunity to these viruses. Viruses also have a different pathogenicity in different environments therefore it is not possible to predict a ‘global pandemic’ based on a computer model that used generic data – that is, the same assumptions for all countries.
The WHO and the media refer to the disease caused by this new influenza virus as ‘COVID19’ but the cases and deaths being attributed to this virus have not identified the SARSCov2 virus in these patients (The Infectious Myth by David Crowe) – only generic coronavirus.
Most of the deaths in all countries have occurred in the elderly and they have all had co-morbidity – and most have also had the flu vaccine. The flu vaccine was mandated in many countries for the first time and it is plausibly linked to causing the neurological damage that is being observed in COVID19 patients.
There a many studies that demonstrate the neurological damage that vaccines cause in people. This was described by the Nobel laureate, Charles, Richet in detail in 1913. The flu vaccine could be causing the premature deaths and illness that we are observing in the aged-care facilities. This is where most of the COVID19 deaths are being recorded – and a new virus is being blamed without any proof of causality. A correlation is being observed in European countries between high COVID deaths and flu vaccination campaigns and this correlation needs to be investigated before a vaccine is used.
Cases of this disease are now referring to healthy people who test positive to a test that does not identify the specific causal virus. These statistics are being used to mandate medical testing, masks and the coming vaccine. The statistics are being manipulated and misused by Bill Gate’s and the corporate partners in the GAVI alliance who influenced the design of the International Health Regulations in 2005 and the Pandemic Preparedness Plans in 2015 and at Event 201 in 2019 – that require all countries to implement the same directives regardless of their specific circumstances or severity.
The problem with this situation is that the health department and the media are misinforming the public about COVID19 by misusing this name to imply that all disease that is labelled COVID19 is caused by this specific coronavirus. This is unproven due to the lack of accurate tests that exist to identify this specific virus.
Cases of COVID19 have been obtained on a clinical diagnosis only in most cases. This means that any illness with ‘flu-like symptoms’ can be listed as COVID19. Despite the fact that these symptoms are caused by many influenza viruses and bacteria, and even from non-infectious causes. Pneumonia can also be caused by non-infectious agents.
The fact that the medical test for the specific virus can only identify generic coronaviruses and not this specific new coronavirus (PCR tests are not a diagnostic tool) has been used by the medical profession to list COVID19 as the main cause of death even though the whole natural virus cannot be identified by this test.
The incidence of this influenza-like disease (cases of COVID19) have also been obtained mostly from a clinical diagnosis only (not laboratory confirmed). This allows many illnesses that have ‘flu-like symptoms’ (from both infectious and non-infectious agents) to be included in this case-load and this has been used by the media to fear-monger about this new disease to influence public behaviour.
It is important that the public is provided with empirical evidence of the causality of this disease before mandatory medical testing, mandatory vaccination and mandatory contact-tracing apps are enforced on the population. This global ‘pandemic’ that has been declared and publicised based on false scientific information is not about health but about population control.
The Australian community needs to make the government accountable for the damage that has been done to our economy and our health with the promotion of false science about this new strain of coronavirus. Australia was the first country to enact the pandemic blueprint on 21 January 2020 when there were no cases of COVID19 listed in Australia and the transmissibility of the new virus was unknown.
Australia is a developed country and the chances of a virus becoming a ‘pandemic’ in 2020 are almost impossible due to our public health infrastructure. Australia did not even have a serious outbreak of disease when the Prime Minister enacted the ‘pandemic blueprint‘ that resulted in extreme measures that locked down the healthy population and caused much illness and distress. It is important to have real data of the risk of a disease before you implement the most extreme measures.
This is significant because predictions about the number of deaths to this virus can only be made with any accuracy from real data of the transmissibility of this virus under Australian conditions. When the head of the Australian Biosecurity Department, Raina MacIntyre, made her prediction of 290,000 – 390,000 deaths from this virus in January 2020 she did not base this prediction on any Australian data.
It was based on flawed scientific assumptions and hypothetical data from other countries – with different environmental conditions.
Here is a webinar of my discussion of COVID19 in Australia (the poor internet connection is fixed at about 15-20 mins) : COVID19 Restrictions and Vaccine Mandates – Public Health of Population Control?