9 March 2020
To buy my book, click here – “Vaccination: Australia’s Loss of Health Freedom“
This book documents the historical control of infectious diseases in Australia and it investigates the rigour of the science underpinning government vaccination programs. The historical evidence demonstrates that there is no scientific justification to mandate any vaccine in the community and that coercive or mandatory vaccination programs are unethical.
Vaccines carry a serious risk for many people and this makes it a crime against the population for governments to enforce a medication with coercive measures.
In the economic model of health that Australia has adopted, profit shapes the ‘science’ for medications, not the public interest. This system allows funding provided by the medical-industry complex to influence the education and beliefs of medical/health practitioners, the community and politicians. They are also influenced by fear campaigns about infectious diseases in the corporate-sponsored media.
Profit is the underlying principle of this model of health and the scientific knowledge is being regulated by the Australian Health Practitioners Regulatory Authority (AHPRA) that is a corporate body influenced by the Australian government that designs vaccination policies. Hence, ‘health’ is now a very profitable industry.
The government has based vaccination programs on unsupported claims about vaccines: risks of vaccines are being downplayed and the benefits overstated. This is leading to the removal of our fundamental human right to decide what we put into our own bodies – bodily autonomy.
Our quality of life depends upon what we put into our own bodies. Here is a 7 min video describing how this global medical tyranny has occurred – Global Medical Tyranny – Dr. Judy Wilyman.
The current program of vaccines is an experiment on the population because the long-term (5-10 years) risk of combining these 16+ vaccines has never been actively monitored. During the last 30 years chronic illnesses and infant mortality has significantly increased but these statistics are not reported in the mainstream media so the community is unaware of this decline in children’s health over this time period.
Government’s are claiming these drugs are ‘safe and effective’ without the hard evidence (empirical evidence) to prove this claim. This is termed ‘undone science’. This situation developed because the US Congress passed an indemnity law to remove all liability from pharmaceutical companies for any harm caused by a ‘vaccine’ after 1986. This effectively removed the precautionary principle that is used in the design of health policy to protect human health.
After 1986 governments could declare vaccines to be ‘safe and effective’ and ignore all the evidence that demonstrated they were not. This was the reversal of the onus of proof of harmlessness so that the public had to prove the death or illness was caused by the vaccine, and not the government proving it was safe before it was marketed to the public. This reversal of the onus of proof of safety protects industry interests in government policy and not the public interest of health.
Therefore, coercing or mandating vaccines, without fully informed consent, is a breach of the Nuremberg Code and also the ethical code of conduct for medical practitioners.
These issues are described in my book along with the WHO’s International Health Regulations (IHR) used to plan a ‘Swine Flu’ Pandemic in 2009 The IHR regulations are designed by the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI) which is corporate-partners and they are recommended by the WHO to all member countries in global health policies.
The GAVI alliance includes public-private partnerships with the Federation of Pharmaceutical Companies, the Bill an Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund etc. It is the International Health Regulations that have been used to lockdown healthy populations, introduce social distancing and remove other freedoms in society in 2020.
The book also provides an in-depth case study of the HPV vaccine that is being promoted as a ‘prevention for cervical cancer’ but is causing serious damage, including infertility (early menopause) and cervical cancer in young women, in a demographic that was previously not at risk from cervical cancer.
In 1975, Henry Gadsden, the head of the vaccine manufacturer Merck & Co and developer of an HPV vaccine, told Fortune Magazine, that “it had long been his dream to make drugs for healthy people, so that Merck could sell to everyone”. Gadsden’s dream now drives the marketing machinery of the most profitable industry on earth (Moynihan and Cassels 2005).
Here is a review of my book by Mrs. Vera West and another one by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler. In July 2022 Professor Ted Steele, Immunologist, did a review of my PhD which has been published in the Infectious Diseases and Therapeutics Journal, titled ‘Wilyman Report on Vaccines: How do we handle the next pandemic, small, large or ‘predicted’?’
If you would like to order my book for $39.95 please use the link above.
Judy Wilyman PhD