- Corrections to the false information Wikipedia is providing on Judy Wilyman PhD – Part 1-2 Corrections and Part 3-6 Corrections and Part 7-10 Breach of Academic Integrity by Institutions
- Click here to see Peter Costello’s Conflict of Interest in Nine Entertainment’s Presentation of Vaccination Issues
- Click here to see the Murdoch News Corp Media influence on Australia’s Vaccination Policy (No Jab No Pay/Play).
- Click here for the Mamamia Blog where Labor’s Tanya Plibersek signed a petition in 2013, without public debate, for the No Jab No Pay policy promoted in the News Corp Media.
- London Real Interview ‘Censorship of the Media and Loss of Free Speech’ with David Icke.
On 13 April 2020 I was contacted by channel 9’s A Current Affair program and asked if I would do an interview with reporter Lauren Golman. This is because I published this 12 min video titled “Media Propaganda on COVID19: the reasons why social distancing and locking down healthy populations are not good ‘precautionary measures’ in the current disease outbreak” (published 4 April 2020). Censored by Youtube on the same day.
This video exposed the flawed scientific assumptions that were used in the mathematical modeling by the GAVI/WHO/CDC to predict a “global pandemic” in 2020. These flawed assumptions have also been exposed in this video by Dr. Kelly Victory – ‘Latest Facts on COVID19 by Dr. Kelly‘.
My Newsletter 263 also describes how the definition of a ‘pandemic was changed’ in order to be able to falsely declare COVID19 as a ‘pandemic’.
On the 13 April my comments were supported by the US Surgeon-General, Jerome Adams when he dumped the WHO/GAVI/CDC ‘Predictive Contagion Model‘ because in his own words “it was not based on real data” (at 13.50 mins on this link he says “Models are projections when you don’t have data”).
More specifically, it was not based on real data from individual countries and this is why you cannot predict a ‘global pandemic’ using a mathematical formula with generic assumptions about pathogenicity. But Bill Gates would not know this because he has no health qualifications (or any formal qualifications) and reputations/careers are destroyed if you speak truth to power.
It is biased media information that is being used to convince the public that vaccines have been the main factor in reducing the risk of infectious diseases. This claim is completely false. I declined to do this interview with channel 9 because of the false information the Australian media (and Wikipedia Part 1-2 and Part 3-10) have spread about my research (and me) since 2009. This was when I first started presenting my research for debate.
Below is the letter that I sent to Lauren Golman on 15 April 2020 explaining why I was not interested in going on A Current Affair on 15 April 2020. Channel 9 ignored the concerns I presented in this letter and the program editor used segments of my video (above – published 4 April) without my permission, to misinterpret my research and comments to the public. This was the very reason why I had declined to do an interview.
In addition, they used the rogue doctor, John Cunningham, leader of the medical-industry SAVN lobby group and a urologist, Kate Armond, to comment on my research – even though the urologist was not presented with any of my research – she was presented with someone else’s letters about vaccination – that had nothing to do with me.
This channel 9 program titled “Anti-Vaxxer’s – Times Up?” framed my research to the public with false information and they did not mention that the US had dumped the flawed contagion model on 13 April 2020: a significant development in this pLanned (faked) pandemic that is removing human rights.
Here is the letter I sent on 15 April to Lauren Golman declining to be interviewed. This letter was copied to a producer at Channel 10 at the same time:
15 April 2020
To Lauren Golman, Channel 9 A Current Affair – Re request for an interview:
Hi Lauren,
I am grateful that you have contacted me but at this stage I am going to decline an interview with you. This is because my experience of 8 years is that the Australian media presents a minimal 10 second grab (at best) of the information that I provide and this is misrepresented to the public without the academic arguments that I am presenting. Over the last decade this has happened to many people who have tried to present the public’s voice on the right to choose what we inject into our own bodies. So I will not do an interview with channel 9 at the moment because I do not want this academic information to be presented as ‘anti-vaccination’ or ‘a conspiracy theory’.
This lie has been perpetuated to the general public by the mainstream media for over a decade now and the public wants a real voice on the issue of whether we lose our right to control what is injected into our own bodies. That is, our opposition to mandatory vaccination policies.
The public’s voice has been removed from the political and mainstream debate due to powerful lobby groups in Australia who influence the political system with large donations. Plus the conflicts of interest of government representatives who are making these policy-decisions. Visit www.over-vaccination.net to see these significant COI of policy-makers in health.
Mandatory vaccination in government legislation is the mandating of a drug for healthy people who have different genetics. This goes against the major principles of medical science that state that all medications must be specific to a person’s genetics. Yet this fundamental medical fact has been ignored by the Australian government.
I have been presenting my academic information in newsletters for 8 years now and not once in that time have I been given an opportunity to present this academic information to the public in a media article without being presented as an ‘anti-vaxxer’ and ‘conspiracy theorist’ and without my information cut to less than 10 seconds.
Hence I will provide you with information I would like to present in this email:
1) I am requesting that if you do a story about my research that you do not present it as anti-vaccination or a conspiracy theory. Universities do not approve PhD’s that do not use evidence to support the arguments therefore I am not presenting a conspiracy theory and you are defaming my research if you present it in this way.
2) My background to this research can be found on my website www.vaccinationdecisions.net
3) This issue is about ‘mandatory’ vaccination not pro- or anti- vaccination. Hence we are talking about whether the government has the right to decide what is injected into people’s bodies and not whether you support or do not support vaccination.
4) The media has suppressed the risks of vaccines, their ingredients and the fact that everybody’s genetics means that they will react differently to a vaccine. Serious deaths and illness will occur in many people after mandating many vaccines (now the flu) vaccine in the population. Here is a reminder of what happened in 2010 after the flu vaccine was promoted to children – Hundreds of seizures, convulsions, and some deaths occurred after this 2009 pandemic swine-flu vaccine was given to children.
5) A global pandemic cannot be predicted on a mathematical model because of the different environmental conditions in every country and the different quality of healthcare systems in different countries/regions. So the prediction of a global pandemic is flawed.
6) Scott Morrison triggered the pandemic response in Australia on 21 January 2020. The WHO did not declare a risk from this virus until 11 March 2020. What evidence did our prime minister use to bring in social distancing in Australia? This has not been provided to the public.
7) Mutated coronaviruses occur every year because they are common in all populations (7-15%) of all respiratory viruses so it is important the Scott Morrison provides the evidence that he used to bring in a police state that was ordered by an outside organisation (the Bill Gate’s funded GAVI alliance that includes the federation of pharmaceutical companies) that did not assess the virus with respect to our own conditions and healthcare in Australia.
8) Disease criteria can be changed from year to year so knowing how these deaths are being diagnosed is critical to whether we have a serious ‘new’ disease or not. Until there is independent assessment of the diagnosis of deaths and transparent knowledge of any underlying health conditions that they have then we do not know that COVID-19 is any more deadly than any other mutated coronavirus that we are exposed to every year in the flu season.
9) Peter McIntyre, ex-director and deputy-director of the government NCIRS for 22 years (1997- December 2017) has not provided the science that has been used to support mandatory vaccination in Australia. Why not? He has also not provided the science that shows that Australian children are healthier after receiving the mandated 12-16 vaccines and he can’t because the government NCIRS DID NOT INVESTIGATE THIS LINK. The Australian government has been negligent in its duty of care to the people and it is mandating multiple vaccines when children’s health has declined significantly since 1997 when the NCIRS was established to research the health effects of vaccines on the population.
10) Since I began promoting my research Peter McIntyre has been involved in inappropriately trying to have my PhD removed with a lobby-group petition, he has participated in a federal crime that was reported to the AFP by being involved in leaking my expert witness report to the media and he and his NCIRS colleagues have written a critique of my PhD thesis that attempts to discredit my thesis with false and misleading information. He has a conflict of interest in doing this because he is responsible for the science that has been used in vaccination policies for 22 years – and now to mandate them.
Lauren – I will be very happy to be interviewed by channel 9 when I am given a guarantee that all of my arguments will be presented without cutting and framing them to present them simply as anti-vaccination and a conspiracy theory. This is a complex and extremely important area of health and to date the mainstream media has allowed the medical industry to present information that is removing human rights in Australia and that promotes and secures a market for more and more vaccines to be mandated in the population. This is not in the public’s best interest and the mainstream media is complicit in promoting the corporate message which is harming human health.
I will publicise this email with a video of the information that I would have provided to you. Please contact me again when you can guarantee that I will be able to present the information that shows how our right to health freedom in Australia has been removed. It is the lack of true investigative journalism in Australia and chief-editors who will not present this information truthfully to the public, that are a major reason why we are in this situation today.
Kind regards,
Judy
This letter was ignored by Lauren Golen and a defamatory article was presented on A Current Affair about my comments and research on the 15 April 2020. This was the date that the US Surgeon-General, Jerome Adams dumped the WHO/GAVI/CDC ‘Predictive Contagion Model’ (the mathematical model that uses false scientific assumptions to predict a global pandemic) because “it was not based on real data” and more specifically, it was not based on real data from individual countries that have different environmental, lifestyle and host/genetic factors that play a significant role in determining that pathogenicity and virulence of a virus in different human populations.
Now we have the Bill Gate’s GAVI alliance rushing a vaccine onto the market based on ‘cases’ of COVID19 that do not have any symptoms (that is healthy people) and they are defined on a medical test that does not identify the natural virus (Novel Coronavirus 2019) – so no proof of causality or illness is provided or even needed. The Emporer’s New Clothes of Pandemics.
The cases do not have any symptoms and it is asymptomatic cases (sub-clinical) of infectious diseases from natural infection that create herd immunity in populations – the opposite of the directives that have been put in place. The GAVI alliance (Bill Gates and the Federation of Pharmaceutical Companies) have reversed the scientific principles so they can convince the public that “only a vaccine will allow the world to go back to normal” – an audacious and pseudo-scientific pLandemic to bring in coercive vaccination programs and the e-health card to participate in society.
Governments globally are randomly removing our freedoms based on this unscientific definition of ‘cases’ in a planned ‘global pandemic’, that included changing the definition of ‘pandemic’ in 2009 to do this, and is based on flawed mathematical modelling.
