COVID19 Vaccines have been Promoted on Lies
Over the last three decades global populations and governments have been ‘educated’ by the medical industry to believe that vaccines i) prevent disease ii) have rare side-effects and iii) have saved millions of lives. But what evidence has been provided to support these claims?
It has not been necessary for governments to provide supportive evidence about vaccines because the terminology used to promote these products implies, they are safe and effective. In 1990, the medical industry changed the terminology in the promotion of vaccines to enhance the community’s belief in these products. At this time the phrase ‘infectious diseases’ was changed to ‘vaccine-preventable diseases.’ This term implies that these injections prevent disease.
The word vaccination was also exchanged for ‘immunisation’: a word that carries the implication that everyone gains immunity after a vaccine. This is false and even though these words have quite different meanings, the Australian government regularly used ‘immunisation’ instead of ‘vaccination’ to imply that everyone that was vaccinated gained immunity. Hence, no evidence was required to convince doctors, the community, or politicians that these injections are effective in preventing disease – it is all implied in the terminology. So, what about safety?
In 1986 the US Congress gave pharmaceutical companies indemnity for any harm caused by a drug that was licensed as a vaccine. This was necessary because vaccine manufacturers were paying millions of dollars in compensation for vaccine damage and deaths to parents every year, but in their claim for indemnity, the medical industry framed them as ‘life-saving products’.
Many countries now have a taxpayer-funded Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to compensate families for the harm that is being caused by childhood vaccines every year – but not Australia. In 2021 the Australian government introduced a tax-payer funded compensation program for the COVID-19 injections only, and the government pays for the associated funeral costs as well.
The consequence of this indemnity was that pharmaceutical companies do not have to prove that vaccines are safe before they market them to the public. This is a reversal of the onus of proof of safety, and since 1986 this onus of proving safety has been put onto the public – and the government can ignore the evidence that parents and independent scientists provide.
In addition, there is no active long-term monitoring (5-10 years) of chronic illnesses and deaths after the vaccines are given. In other words, governments do not know the frequency and types of illnesses/deaths that vaccines are causing in genetically diverse populations.
Governments simply claim adverse events are ‘rare’ or ‘are a coincidence’, after the injection is given. Further, doctors are ‘educated’ to believe that vaccines ‘rarely cause adverse events’, and the medical regulatory guidelines discourage doctors from putting ‘vaccine’ (an injected drug) as a cause of injury or death after the mRNA injections.
But this claim of ‘rare’ is being made without the empirical evidence to support these claims because the necessary studies to prove they are safe, have never been done. To further enhance the public’s belief (trust) that vaccines are safe, the Australian government has claimed for decades that ‘vaccines are only marketed after 10 years to ensure that the benefits overwhelmingly outweigh the risks.’
Yet the COVID injection has been labelled a ‘vaccine’ without any testing in animals and with only 6 months of testing in humans: but not for safety with an inert placebo. The data in this brief clinical trial was hidden from the public in 2021 and was compromised by giving the placebo group the mRNA injections at the end to hide the signal of a causal link to the significant adverse events / deaths in the vaccinated group.
In February 2021, the Australian Health Minister, Greg Hunt, informed the community that the government was implementing a new vaccine against COVID-19 disease that was ‘safe and effective’. He stated that Australians would be participating in the largest phase 3 clinical trial ever with this new ‘COVID19 vaccine’. This was an untested mRNA gene-technology that had Emergency Use Only (EUO) approval – an experimental injection.
So why were governments calling this drug a ‘vaccine’ and why were they claiming it was safe and effective without clinical trial data to prove it? Here are the facts from 2021 when it was mandated in many professions for workers to keep their jobs:
- The COVID19 injection had never been tested to prove it prevents the transmission of Coronavirus 2019 (SARSCov-2) in the community.
- The TGA had not tested the drug for 10 years to ensure it was safe or to ensure that the benefits outweighed the risks.
- It did not contain any part of a natural Coronavirus 2019 to specifically target this pathogen to prevent COVID-19 disease.
- It did not reduce hospitalisations / deaths to COVID-19 disease – the serious cases of this disease.
- It is described as a new gene-therapy containing untested mRNA genetic technology.
There are no criteria under any definition of a vaccine that enables this genetic technology to be called a ‘vaccine’. This is false and misleading promotion of a drug to the community that has significant life and death consequences. The word ‘vaccine’ is loaded with the belief that i) it prevents the disease ii) it doesn’t have serious side-effects (‘rare’) and iii) that you need to use it to protect the community. This promotion of this gene-technology as a vaccine by the government is deceitful and it is also an experiment on the population.
In 2022 the COVID hospitalisations / deaths, miscarriages, infertility, heart attacks, cancer and chronic illnesses have all increased significantly since the campaign was implemented in Australia in February 2021. Tragically doctors are being told to inform patients that this could not be a result of this new untested gene technology. This is not evidence-based medicine.
The misuse of the word ‘vaccine’ has enabled families and friends to be divided and healthy people to be arbitrarily removed from society. It also allows bullying and ostracism with the word ‘anti-vaxxer’. Group think has taken over the workplace and it has resulted in the destruction of the social and genetic fabric of society.
This deception can be stopped immediately by calling this injection what it is – untested gene technology (COVID injection/jab) – and no government legislation can remove you to the quarantine camps or from society if everyone stops misusing the word ‘vaccine’.
