25 September 2020
The Evidence that supports the Claim that Vaccines are Destroying the Genetic Fabric of Society
In 1960 Australian Frank MacFarlane Burnet received the Nobel Prize for immunology. At this time he stated:
“Genetics, nutrition, psychological and environmental factors may play a more important role in resistance to disease than the assumed benefits of artificial immunity induced by vaccination“.
He considered that “genetic deterioration of the population may be a consequence of universal mass vaccination and he postulated that in the long-term vaccination may be against the best interests of the state“.
In addition to these statements, Stanley Plotkin, who is considered the ‘Father of World Vaccinology‘ stated in 2019 that ‘antibody titre is not a reliable indicator because we do not know precisely how antibodies work’. This is significant because the efficacy of all vaccines is based solely on the surrogate of antibody titre. And as we know many vaccinated children are still getting the diseases they are vaccinated against.
It is also important to note that the human immune system is more complex than just an antibody response, and natural immunity is not the same as artificial vaccine-induced immunity (antibody titre).
By 2004 ~45% of children 0-14 years of age in all highly vaccinated populations, had a chronic illness and in 2020 this figure is now closer to 50% in many countries.
Many parents are now long-term carers for children who will never reach their potential in life. In addition, the incidence of autism is predicted to be 1 in 2 children by 2032; a disease that is 4-times more prevalent in boys than girls.
Yet governments globally have ignored these facts and the overwhelming science linking these diseases to vaccines for three decades. They have also ignored the well known contraindications to vaccines that are due to genetics (family history), by reducing all of these contraindications to just one – anaphylaxis. And family history is not enough – you must try the vaccine first.
On the advice of the medical-industry complex, governments and doctors are claiming that this significant increase in chronic illness in children is a ‘coincidence‘ after vaccination. Governments have ignored basic scientific principles of evidence-based medicine to provide this response to parents for decades.
My Publications on the Ethics of Mandatory and Coercive Vaccination Policies
- ‘A new strain of influenza or a change in surveillance?’ After investigating the Swine flu ‘pandemic’ of 2009, that did not turn out to be a ‘pandemic’, I had this article published in the Australasian College of Environmental and Nutritional Medicine (ACNEM) Vol 28, No 4, Dec 2009. The article describes how increased surveillance of a disease can be used to give the appearance of an increased number of cases which can be misused by the media to create fear about a new virus. This can be achieved through statistical manipulation as we have observed in both 2009 and now in 2020 with COVID19.
- Mandatory and Coercive Vaccination: how ethical is this policy?’ – A poster presentation at the Australian Health Promotion Association conference in Perth 2009.
- An article published in the Medical Veritas Journal in 2015 – The Ethics of Childhood Influenza: should Australian children be immunised against influenza? Influenza is a disease that the majority of children and adults are not at risk of dying from – has this changed in 2020 or is it a change to the diagnostic criteria for influenza?
