23 August 2019
Mandatory Vaccination Policies are not based on Science
Here is the evidence from doctors and scientists that confirms the conclusions in my PhD that governments have not proven the safety and efficacy of vaccines using properly designed clinical studies.
This is a 5 minute video – Your Children Your Choice (by GreenMedInfo.com) – that shows that the government’s claims about vaccines are not based on scientific evidence.
These claims are made by not acknowledging the independent research on the adverse health outcomes of vaccines (including death) and the family history of the genetic links to chronic illness that occurs after vaccination.
This results in doctors and governments claiming these reactions are just a ‘coincidence’ after vaccination despite the fact that they have been linked as side-effects to vaccines on the package inserts for over six decades.
If this policy was truly about protecting human health then the government would have ensured that the direct dose-response relationship between the vaccines and these chronic illnesses and death was investigated. But it has not.
Here is the summary of the four main themes in my PhD thesis that demonstrates that government vaccination policies are based on undone science – this is the term given to clinical studies that are required to be done by governments before they claim to the public that a drug/vaccine is safe and effective.
If these studies are not done before the drug/vaccince is promoted then the policy is not being designed to protect human health. It is being designed to protect the proponent of the drug/vaccine – in this case the profits of pharmaceutical companies.
The mandating of 16 vaccines in Australia in education, employment and social welfare policies means that Australians are givng their bodies, and their children’s bodies, to the government to decide what is injected into them in the name of ‘health’.
It is no longer a medical decision that is being made by doctors after assessing the family history of the patient and allowing the patient to give informed consent. This is a serious breach of civil liberties that has not been justified.
This medical intervention is now being determined by politicians and not doctors because doctor’s autonomy to speak about their assessment of the risks of vaccines with the support of the medical profession has been removed.
If an Australian doctor speaks openly about the independent studies showing the serious risks to human health of vaccines, that have not been provided in their pharma-sponsored education, they can be de-registered from the medical profession.
The doctors that do speak up on their assessment of vaccine risks from the full body of literature are now required to say that they are providing their ‘personal opinion’ and not that of the ‘accepted science’ as decided by the Medical Board of Australia (MBA).
This situation is called a medical tyranny because the ‘accepted science’ is being determined by a select (elite) group of medical practitioners and not by the community of scientists and health professionals that are qualified to make this decision.
This medical tyranny has been achieved by governments and doctors using selective studies funded by the pharmaceutical companies to promote vaccines to the community and by using the registration of doctors to ensure they comply with the policy.
In Australia, Peter McIntyre has been one of Australia’s most prominant advisors of vaccination policy for 20+ years. Since my universtiy research on the control of infectious diseases in Australia was published he has used many inappropriate strategies, some with known industry-lobby groups, to prevent a public debate of my academic research on vaccination policies.
This has included being associated with a federal crime to prevent my affidafit being heard in Australia’s Federal Circuit court in 2018.
Here is a link to my interview with Mery Dory (Australian Vaccination-Risks Network AVN) in her radio program Under the Wire that explains some of the censorship of the scientific debate of vaccines and the false and misleading health information that is being provided to the public through the official government channels, the media and through Wikipedia.
This is resulting in agnotology in health – a term that describes the indoctrination of the community with false and misleading health information because the people with money (pharmaceutical companies) have the power to influence the official channels of disseminating health information. They also have the power to silence their critics with structural (political) barriers to prevent them having a voice in the mainstream media or in the political arena (See chapter 8 of my PhD thesis).
Please join the national conference and rally for all Australians in Canberra on Sunday 15 (4-7pm) and Monday 16 (10-2pm) September 2019. This event is to protest against Australia’s mandatory and coercive vaccination policies that remove civil liberties and are not based on scientific evidence. The speakers for this event and a ticket link will be provided soon.
Judy Wilyman PhD
Bachelor of Science, University of NSW
Diploma of Education (Science), University of Wollongong
Master of Science (Population Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Wollongong.
PhD in A critical analysis of the Australian government’s rationale for its vaccination policy‘ (the science, politics and ethics of Australia’s vaccination policies) , UOW School of Humanities and Social Inquiry.
Website Vaccination Decisions
Some of the Ingredients in Vaccines:
Did you know that antibiotics are in most vaccines? Many people are allergic to antibiotics and using any vaccone carries the serious risk of anaphylactic shock to this and many other vaccine ingredients. Are you being informed of this before you give consent to givng your newborn baby a vaccine?
Here is a link to the Australian government’s list of ingredients in vaccines and the US CDC’s list of ingredients that is not provided to politicians, doctors or parents before vaccines are given to children.
Please consider whether you want these substances injected into the tissues of your new born infant before the blood brain barrier is developed at 6 months of age or their other body systems. These ingredients and more are present in vaccines and the vaccination schedule has expanded to 16 vaccines requiring 52 doses from birth to adolescence.
And the ‘new norm’ – allergies, anaphylaxis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), autoimmune disorders (diabetes, childhood rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis, multiple schlerosis etc.), thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), autism, speech delay, neurological disorders, encephalopathy, meningitis, ADHD, childhood cancers, and many more…..
But your doctor will inform you that this is ‘just a coincidence‘ because the MBA and the Australian government have never funded a causality study that would disprove this association. That is, a study that uses an inert placebo in the unvaccinated trial group to prove the safety of each vaccine over an appropriate time period that includes the delay in the appearance of these diseases – or the safety of the combination of vaccines on the government schedule:
Antibiotics: Neomycin, Polymxin, Gentamicin, Kanamycin
Thimerosal (50% mercury compound) (flu vaccine multidose vials and infanrix-hexa and hep B 2013)
Borax (‘sodium borate’ – causes infertility and is found in HPV vaccines and hep A)
Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
Supporting Public Interest Research
I would like to thank everyone who has supported my research and newsletters over the last 5-10 years. If you have appreciated this unfunded independent research and debate of children’s health I hope you will consider a $5 donation for the up-keep of my website and continuation of my voluntary newsletters.
Only funded research is promoted to the public and universities do not promote student research. Hence the need for my website and newsletters to promote my independent research that is in the public interest.
My website Vaccination Decisions became necessary because the University of Wollongong is not required to rectify the academic record to the public when organised lobby group activists, such as Australian Skeptic Inc / SAVN, and other activists from the powerful industry-medical complex provide false information about my university research in the mainstream media.