There are many organisations and websites appearing on the internet that claim to be ‘independent and not affiliated with any group, organisation, or individual’ and they are claiming that the science against using multiple vaccines is ‘pseudoscientific’. One such website is “Diluted Thinking in Australian Healthcare” which is maintained and operated by Christine Bayne. This website criticises peer-reviewed journals and academics who are presenting science from medical journals in universities -without providing evidence for the criticisms that are made. Whose interests are being pursued by ignoring or removing scientific arguments? Certainly not the general public’s.
This website is also advertised on Skeptic Blogs such as rat.bags.com. Could this author be the Christine Bayne who is promoted on LinkIn as a Programme Specialist at Med com (UK) pharmaceuticals and who was previously the marketing assistant for Parexel, Howmedica from 1992-1998? The author of the website has not provided any evidence that she is not this Christine so the public cannot be sure that the information provided on this website is ‘independent’.
This issue is about policy-decision makers using unbiased science in policy-development yet Christine Bayne’s website, like the Skeptics, prefers to talk about ‘conspiracy theorists’. This is not helpful to holding a proper academic debate on the topic of vaccination.
