31 July 2019
Important Information:
1. The Perth Rally to oppose the No Jab No Play Bill will be held on Friday 2 August 2019 from 11am – 2pm at Forrest Place in the Perth CBD.
2. In a democratic government statutory legislation cannot be enforced without the consent of the public. The passing of this bill in WA has removed the medical freedom to fully informed consent to a medical intervention. This has been done without transparency and accountability, and by removing the informed public’s voice from the political debate of this issue. This has resulted in the approval of a bill that enforces medical tyranny on the WA population.
3. The well documented 158 serious adverse events to vaccines – life threatening illnesses that are now very common in the population.
4. This is a clause in the WA Public Health Act 2016 – c) to restrain the relevant person –
(ii) to enable the relevant person to be vaccinated and (d) to remove anything (including underwear) that the relevant person is wearing if – (i) the removal of the thing is reasonably necessary…. to enable the person to be vaccinated…
The Main Reasons why the WA No Jab No Play Bill is invalid and should be Disapproved
On 22 July 2019 the Western Australian government approved the introduction of a vaccination bill that mandates 12-16 vaccines in children (0-5 years of age) before they can attend any organised childcare centre in WA. The mainstream media refers to this bill as the ‘No Jab No Play Bill’.
The most important reason why this bill is invalid is because children’s health has significantly DECLINED with the addition of each new vaccine to the national schedule over the last two decades. This fact demonstrates that the bill is not about improving health but about using as many vaccines as the pharmaceutical companies develop.
This bill also discriminates against healthy children and removes human rights from parents in WA that have not been removed in other states of Australia. This is unconstitutional. This bill discriminates and segregates heathy children based on the injection of substances into the human body – a medical intervention.
This directive is contrary to the oath that all doctors take to practice medicine. The oath states they will put their patient’s best interest first and not use their position to remove human rights. This bill also breaches the Nuremberg Code: an international human rights covenant designed to prevent governments experimenting on the population.
In passing this legislation the government did not provide the following evidence:
1. Evidence that children’s health has improved with the expansion of the vaccination program (it has significantly declined as the vaccination program expanded). Therefore this policy is not about health of the community and it cannot be described as a ‘protective public health policy’.
2. Evidence that only the unvaccinated children are getting cases of these 16+ diseases.
3. Evidence of a country that has used these 16 vaccines with a 95% uptake rate to create herd immunity to eliminate these diseases.
In addition, the detail about the number of vaccines that children are now required to attend childcare centres – ~16 vaccines or 45 doses before 5 years of age – has not been provided in the mainstream media at any time.
This is significant because the public has lost fundamental human rights in this bill – the right to bodily integrity (autonomy) – the right to decide what is injected into our own bodies or our children’s bodies in the name of ‘health’.
This right has now been given to the government and the doctor’s autonomy to give patient advice has now been overridden by this government legislation.
The government, as a result of industry lobbying, large donations from big pharma and conflicts of interest on government advisory boards, can now continue to add more vaccines to the national program without providing any supportive evidence for this policy. This is occurring whilst parents/politicians/doctors are not being fully informed about the risks and benefits of vaccines before they are coerced into vaccination with childcare arrangements and up to ~$26,000 in welfare benefits.
In particular, the ingredients of vaccines are not provided to the public or the well documented 158 serious adverse events that are now very common in the population.
The vaccines that the government has mandated are vaccines that the majority of parents have never received and therefore were not used with a 95% uptake rate to control these diseases.
The suggestion by the Australian Medical Association (an industry-medical lobby group) that healthy adults now need to be on a catch-up schedule for 16+ vaccines is not supported by any evidence and it will cause significant chronic illness and deaths in the population.
Public health policy needs to be based on the Precautionary Principle that ensures governments provide evidence that a medical intervention will not harm the population. This policy is not based on the precautionary principle because the government has not proved harmlessness of the combined schedule of vaccines.
The most important fact that invalidates this legislation is the fact that children’s health has significantly DECLINED with the addition of each new vaccine to the national schedule.
These chronic illnesses and deaths are preventable in the population and were not observed in this frequency prior ro 1990 when the policy was expanded. Australians must demand an open debate of the science in public forums and by the media, before they give consent to the current mandatory vaccination policies in the WA Public Health Act 2016.
This bill has been bulldozed through the WA parliament after being discussed for only 6 days in the WA parliament – a complex public health document.
Public Health Act 2016 Part 11 Division 2 Section 157 – 158
Here is an extract from the WA Public Health Act (updated in 2016) that shows that bodily autonomy has already been removed in Australia without the public’s participation in the development of this policy. This has also happened whilst the Australian govenrment is claiming that “vaccination in Australia is not compulsory”.
Section 157 Serious public health incident powers (a ‘serious public health incident’ is not defined in this Act)
An authorised officer may do all or any of these – (a) close any premises (b) direct any person to enter, not enter or to leave any premises (c) direct any person to remain at any premises for any period of time specified by the officer……. (J) direct any person to undergo medical observation, medical examination or to be vaccinated.
A power under subsection (1) to enter any premises may be exercised without a warrant or the consent of the occupier of the premises…….
Section 158 Enforcement of requirement to undergo medical observation, medical examination
If an authorised officer gives a direction to a person under section 157 (1) (J) to undergo medical observation, medical examination or to be vaccinated an authorised officer or police officer may use reasonable force to ensure the direction is complied including, if necessary ………(c) to restrain the relevant person – (ii) to enable the relevant person to be vaccinated and (d) to remove anything (including underwear) that the relevant person is wearing if – (i) the removal of the thing is reasonably necessary…. to enable the person to be vaccinated…
A Lack of Due Process in the Parliamentary Process in Western Australia
The WA government has approved this bill without the media reporting on the detail of this bill as it passed through the parliament and without the WA government publishing the 500+ public submissions against this bill on the government website.
Further, the bill was only debated in the parliament for 6 days before the bill was passed and not a single politician represented the informed public’s position that opposes this bill or debated the significant human rights that will be lost by enforcing this bill.
The informed public’s voice was removed from the parliamentary debate and the media has also censored this debate by promoting false and misleading information on the benefits of vaccines without reporting on the risks – serious autoimmune diseases, neurological damage and deaths.
Here is my unedited interview with channel 9 after this bill was approved that describes the science that has been ignored in passing this policy and that was not shown by channel 9 when it reported on the new legislation on 22 July 2019.
The media has falsely reported that the risks of vaccines are rare or 1 in a million, and this claim is being made without monitoring the effects of vaccines with a true placebo or the latent effects that arise months or years after the vaccine is given.
The Premier of WA, Mark McGowan, has rushed this policy through parliament on false and unsupported claims about the necessity for this bill and without transparency in the public consultation process or inclusion of the informed public’s voice in the parliamentary discussion.
Therefore the informed public of Western Australia do not give their consent to this legislation. In a democratic government statutory legislation cannot be enforced without the consent of the public. A government that does enforce legislation without due process and the consent of the public is a tyrannical government. The passing of this bill in WA has removed the medical freedom to informed consent and this has occurred without public debate.
The serious chronic illness that is escalating in children has been listed as side-effects on the pharmaceutical package inserts for vaccines for six decades. If the premier of WA cannot provide evidence that children’s health is improving under the national vaccination program then this new legislation is not about health and the legislation is invalid.
The informed public of WA does not accept this legislation until the WA government has provided the scientific evidence to show that the policy is necessary and that it improves public health.
Please also be advised that the Australian government did not provide this evidence in a court case to be heard in the Queensland Federal Circuit Court on 12 December 2018. Instead the Australian government’s team in this court case was involved in committing a federal crime that resulted in the case not being heard in court.
Judy Wilyman PhD
Bachelor of Science, University of NSW
Diploma of Education (Science), University of Wollongong
Master of Science (Population Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Wollongong.
PhD in A critical analysis of the Australian government’s rationale for its vaccination policy‘ (the science, politics and ethics of Australia’s vaccination policies) , UOW School of Humanities and Social Inquiry.
Website Vaccination Decisions
Some of the Ingredients in Vaccines:
Did you know that antibiotics are in most vaccines? Many people are allergic to antibiotics and using any vaccone carries the serious risk of anaphylactic shock to this and many other vaccine ingredients. Are you being informed of this before you give consent to givng your newborn baby a vaccine?
Here is a link to the Australian government’s list of ingredients in vaccines and the US CDC’s list of ingredients that is not provided to politicians, doctors or parents before vaccines are given to children.
Please consider whether you want these substances injected into the tissues of your new born infant before the blood brain barrier is developed at 6 months of age or their other body systems. These ingredients and more are present in vaccines and the vaccination schedule has expanded to 16 vaccines requiring 52 doses from birth to adolescence.
And the ‘new norm’ – allergies, anaphylaxis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), autoimmune disorders (diabetes, childhood rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis, multiple schlerosis etc.), thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), autism, speech delay, neurological disorders, encephalopathy, meningitis, ADHD, childhood cancers, and many more…..
But your doctor will inform you that this is ‘just a coincidence‘ because the MBA and the Australian government have never funded a causality study that would disprove this association. That is, a study that uses an inert placebo in the unvaccinated trial group to prove the safety of each vaccine over an appropriate time period that includes the delay in the appearance of these diseases – or the safety of the combination of vaccines on the government schedule:
Antibiotics: Neomycin, Polymxin, Gentamicin, Kanamycin
Aluminium hydroxide
Aluminium hydroxide/phosphate
Aluminium phosphate
Thimerosal (50% mercury compound) (flu vaccine multidose vials and infanrix-hexa and hep B 2013)
Borax (‘sodium borate’ – causes infertility and is found in HPV vaccines and hep A)
Polysorbate 80
Egg protein
Formaldehyde
Gelatin
Phenol
Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
Phenoxyethanol
Yeast
Supporting Public Interest Research
I would like to thank everyone who has supported my research and newsletters over the last 5-10 years. If you have appreciated this unfunded independent research and debate of children’s health I hope you will consider a $5 donation for the up-keep of my website and continuation of my voluntary newsletters.
Only funded research is promoted to the public and universities do not promote student research. Hence the need for my website and newsletters to promote my independent research that is in the public interest.
My website Vaccination Decisions became necessary because the University of Wollongong is not required to rectify the academic record to the public when organised lobby group activists, such as Australian Skeptic Inc / SAVN, and other activists from the powerful industry-medical complex provide false information about my university research in the mainstream media.
