21 December 2018
Important No Jab No Play information for WA in this issue:
Phase 1 (January 2019): The WA government is enhancing the powers of the Chief Medical Officer to exclude all children who are not “fully” vaccinated from enrolment even when there is no outbreak of disease.
Phase 1 (January 2019): Childcare centres for pre-school care are to be required to provide the vaccination documentation for every child who enrols but all children can still attend.
Phase 2 (July 2019): Children who have not received all 16 vaccines will be banned from early childhood education by 2020.
On the 14 December 2018 as parents were preparing for the Christmas holidays the WA government informed the community that they would be introducing the No Jab No Play legislation into the parliament in early 2019. This legislation is designed to exclude children who are not ‘fully’ vaccinated with 16 vaccines from enrolling in childcare centres and kindergartens.
Children in WA who are not fully vaccinated will still be allowed to enrol in childcare up to 2020 but they will be asked to show their vaccination documentation.
This is discrimination of healthy children based on the injection of substances into the human body and based on the false claim that vaccinated children are not getting these infectious diseases.
It is well known that many vaccinated children are still getting these diseases and the government has not supported the NJNPlay policies with supportive evidence of the vaccination status of cases of these diseases – or consulted the community.
The term ‘vaccine-preventable disease‘ is a misnomer created by the pharmaceutical/medical industry. The correct name is ‘infectious diseases‘ and they were not controlled by vaccines.
If the government wants to make this claim then the public must see transparent evidence of the number of vaccinated and unvaccinated children who are getting these diseases – before this policy is implemented.
The 16 vaccines that are being mandated in this policy have not been used by most adults because they were only recently added to the schedule. Under this policy most adults would be considered ‘unvaccinated‘ and there has been no increased risk from these diseases to warrant this policy in 2019.
Whilst the government says there will be a public consultation process after the bill is drafted they have already gone ahead and put phase 1 in place.
This involves increasing the powers of the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) to be able to ban unvaccinated children from childcare and pre-school centres even when there is no outbreak of disease.
Previously the CMO has been able to do this when there is an outbreak of a disease but from July 2019 they will be able to do this even when there is no threat of disease.
These extra powers are being implemented without the government being required to provide evidence for the need for this change and without public debate of these new powers.
The unproven and misleading information provided by the government and journalists in this media article includes:
- The claim that vaccination rates in WA are low and
- The claim that unvaccinated children are putting the community at risk.
- The assumption that 95% vaccination rates for 16 diseases will improve children’s health
The WA Health Department has not provided any evidence to support these claims:
- The vaccination rates for 1 and 5 year old cohorts in WA are at 93% – similar to the rest of Australia. In the media announcement the government publicised vaccination rates for the 2 year old cohort from 2017 but these were low due to the artificial definition of ‘fully’ vaccinated. The rate appeared lower because fewer vaccines were on the schedule in 2017. The government and media have deliberately misled the public with these statistics and there is no increased risk from any of these diseases to support this new policy.
- ‘Vaccination’ is not ‘immunisation’ and the health department is misusing this word. The health minister has claimed that children who are not fully ‘immunised’ (he means vaccinated) are putting older children and the community at risk. This is not true. In many cases it is vaccinated children who are getting these infectious diseases. This policy needs to be supported by transparent statistics of the number of vaccinated and unvaccinated children getting the 16 diseases for which we are mandating vaccines before this discriminatory policy is implemented.
- There is no vaccine that has ever been used with a 95% uptake rate to prove that this will improve health outcomes of children or the community. ‘Health’ includes chronic illness as well as illness from an infectious disease.
- The No Jab No Play policy coerces parents into using 16 vaccines if they depend upon childcare for their income. The government is coercing parents with welfare benefits and now early childhood education to inject substances (that they are not informed about) into the human body.
- Doctors are being coerced into giving vaccines with financial benefits for each child that they vaccinate and also for increasing the under 5 year old ‘immunisation’ (they mean ‘vaccination’) rates of their medical practices.
- Doctors will also be de-registered if they present the serious risks associated with vaccines to their patients. This is being labelled as ‘anti-vaccination material’ and they are told to say it is only a ‘coincidence’ when it happens after vaccination.
This discriminatory policy is being introduced without any public scrutiny of the science and without any community input into the development of the policy.
Since 1990 vaccines are the one significant environmental exposure that all children are receiving from day one of life and the evidence is showing that children’s health has declined significantly with the addition of each new vaccine to the schedule.
What justification is there for mandating 16 vaccines in children when their health is observed to be declining with an increase in the specific diseases that pharmaceutical companies have associated with vaccines on the package inserts for 6 decades?
The health department is claiming that ‘correlation is not causation’ and that these AE’s are just a ‘coincidence’. But this is evidence in itself that the Australian health department has failed in its duty of care to the public to investigate this direct correlation.
This represents a policy based on a lack of science not based on scientific evidence. The onus of proof of safety is on the Australian government and they have not provided this evidence.
Mandatory vaccination policies will harm many Australian children – both their health and their education – and the WA Health Minister will be held accountable by the parents for any harm these policies cause in their children that is known to be associated with vaccines.
Judy Wilyman PhD
Bachelor of Science, University of NSW
Diploma of Education (Science), University of Wollongong
Master of Science (Population Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Wollongong.
PhD in A critical analysis of the Australian government’s rationale for its vaccination policy‘ (the science, politics and ethics of Australia’s vaccination policies) , UOW School of Humanities and Social Inquiry.
Website Vaccination Decisions
Some of the Ingredients in Vaccines:
Did you know that antibiotics are in most vaccines? Many people are allergic to antibiotics and using any vaccone carries the serious risk of anaphylactic shock to this and many other vaccine ingredients. Are you being informed of this before you give consent to givng your newborn baby a vaccine?
Here is a link to the Australian government’s list of ingredients in vaccines and the US CDC’s list of ingredients that is not provided to politicians, doctors or parents before vaccines are given to children.
Please consider whether you want these substances injected into the tissues of your new born infant before the blood brain barrier is developed at 6 months of age or their other body systems. These ingredients and more are present in vaccines and the vaccination schedule has expanded to 16 vaccines requiring 52 doses from birth to adolescence.
And the ‘new norm’ – allergies, anaphylaxis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), autoimmune disorders (diabetes, childhood rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis, multiple schlerosis etc.), thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), autism, speech delay, neurological disorders, encephalopathy, meningitis, ADHD, childhood cancers, and many more…..
But your doctor will inform you that this is ‘just a coincidence‘ because the MBA and the Australian government have never funded a causality study that would disprove this association. That is, a study that uses an inert placebo in the unvaccinated trial group to prove the safety of each vaccine over an appropriate time period that includes the delay in the appearance of these diseases – or the safety of the combination of vaccines on the government schedule:
Antibiotics: Neomycin, Polymxin, Gentamicin, Kanamycin
Thimerosal (50% mercury compound) (flu vaccine multidose vials and infanrix-hexa and hep B 2013)
Borax (‘sodium borate’ – causes infertility and is found in HPV vaccines and hep A)
Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
Supporting Public Interest Research
I would like to thank everyone who has supported my research and newsletters over the last 5-10 years. If you have appreciated this unfunded independent research and debate of children’s health I hope you will consider a $5 donation for the up-keep of my website and continuation of my voluntary newsletters.
Only funded research is promoted to the public and universities do not promote student research. Hence the need for my website and newsletters to promote my independent research that is in the public interest.
My website Vaccination Decisions became necessary because the University of Wollongong is not required to rectify the academic record to the public when organised lobby group activists, such as Australian Skeptic Inc / SAVN, and other activists from the powerful industry-medical complex provide false information about my university research in the mainstream media.