20 March 2018
In Australia and the US doctors / health practitioners are being required to promote government vaccination policies by their professional regulatory boards. This is being achieved by choosing the “accepted” literature and by dismissing the serious risks of vaccines as “anti-vaccination”.
The authorities are not allowing scientific debate on the risks and benefits of this medical procedure and health practitioners are not provided with the ingredients of vaccines or their adverse events in their medical education.
Please read the letter below that describes what happens when a medical doctor in the US or Australia assesses the full body of medical lterature on vaccines for themselves. This letter was sent to ~60 University of Wollongong academics, some of whom are promoting false claims about vaccines on the UOW website that have not been supported by addressing the academic arguments in my PhD thesis on this topic which is also published on the UOW website):
19 March 2018
Copied to UOW Vice-Chancellor Paul Wellings, Professor’s Heather Yeatman and Alison Jones and UOW Academics,
Dear Concerned Australians and Global Community,
I have copied UOW academics into this email because Professor Heather Yeatman has promoted the government’s pro-vaccine claims about immunisation on the UOW website without ever researching the control of infectious diseases in Australia or the ingredients of vaccines and how vaccines are trialled for safety and efficacy.
Her UOW colleagues were asked to sign their names to this promotion in January 2016 also without researching this topic or addressing my in-depth research on this topic.
My research is published on the University of Wollongong website because it is evidence-based.
UOW Vice-Chancellor, Paul Wellings and the UOW academics in this email can remain silent on this topic but they can never say they did not know that they were promoting false information about vaccines to the public that is not evidence-based and will harm human health.
The right to bodily integrity (without coercion for welfare benefits, early childhood education, or employment) for some individuals has already been lost in Australia. This includes children and university students who are doing degrees in health / medicine and some other professions. Now there is a push in Australia for nurses and other professionals to get mandatory flu vaccines.
Please watch this half hour video of a doctor in Ohio who got sick from the flu vaccine and after investigating the ingredients of vaccines (as this is not taught in medical school) he linked them to the escalating chronic illness in the population and publicised this plausible cause of illness in an article. Then he lost his job.
Vaccines a Doctor’s Perspective
I also know of a doctor who had a flu vaccine whilst she was pregnant and her child was born disabled. This is anecdotal but the story is common and the damage is not systematically monitored or publicised by the Australian government. This should have been done before the vaccine was approved for all pregnant women – but it was not. The pharmaceutical companies do not use inert placebos in vaccine trials and there are no independent trials on vaccines.
Here are the ingredients of vaccines taken from the US CDC website. We use many of the same vaccines in Australia but they are licensed under a different name. I have also provided an information sheet on the flaws in the Maurice-Blackburn lawyers arguments that are being used to justify the removal of vaccination rights in Australia.
Please forward this to your family and friends and fight for your right for medical freedom and bodily integrity that are not being protected in Australia.
Judy Wilyman PhD
Bachelor of Science, University of NSW
Diploma of Education (Science), University of Wollongong
Master of Science (Population Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Wollongong.
PhD in A critical analysis of the Australian government’s rationale for its vaccination policy‘ (the science, politics and ethics of Australia’s vaccination policies) , UOW School of Humanities and Social Inquiry.
Website Vaccination Decisions
Some of the Ingredients in Vaccines:
Did you know that antibiotics are in most vaccines? Many people are allergic to antibiotics and using any vaccone carries the serious risk of anaphylactic shock to this and many other vaccine ingredients. Are you being informed of this before you give consent to givng your newborn baby a vaccine?
Here is a link to the Australian government’s list of ingredients in vaccines and the US CDC’s list of ingredients that is not provided to politicians, doctors or parents before vaccines are given to children.
Please consider whether you want these substances injected into the tissues of your new born infant before the blood brain barrier is developed at 6 months of age or their other body systems. These ingredients and more are present in vaccines and the vaccination schedule has expanded to 16 vaccines requiring 52 doses from birth to adolescence.
And the ‘new norm’ – allergies, anaphylaxis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), autoimmune disorders (diabetes, childhood rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis, multiple schlerosis etc.), thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), autism, speech delay, neurological disorders, encephalopathy, meningitis, ADHD, childhood cancers, and many more…..
But your doctor will inform you that this is ‘just a coincidence‘ because the MBA and the Australian government have never funded a causality study that would disprove this association. That is, a study that uses an inert placebo in the unvaccinated trial group to prove the safety of each vaccine over an appropriate time period that includes the delay in the appearance of these diseases – or the safety of the combination of vaccines on the government schedule:
Antibiotics: Neomycin, Polymxin, Gentamicin, Kanamycin
Thimerosal (50% mercury compound) (flu vaccine multidose vials and infanrix-hexa and hep B 2013)
Borax (‘sodium borate’ – causes infertility and is found in HPV vaccines and hep A)
Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
Supporting Public Interest Research
I would like to thank everyone who has supported my research and newsletters over the last 5-10 years. If you have appreciated this unfunded independent research and debate of children’s health I hope you will consider a $5 donation for the up-keep of my website and continuation of my voluntary newsletters.
Only funded research is promoted to the public and universities do not promote student research. Hence the need for my website and newsletters to promote my independent research that is in the public interest.
My website Vaccination Decisions became necessary because the University of Wollongong is not required to rectify the academic record to the public when organised lobby group activists, such as Australian Skeptic Inc / SAVN, and other activists from the powerful industry-medical complex provide false information about my university research in the mainstream media.