This interview on TNT Radio with Dr. Judy Wilyman (18 June 2022) – Part 1 and Part 2 – describes how the media, medical-industry and government can hide the real interpretation of disease statistics when they collaborate to achieve the same goal.
This is a result of doctors being educated with industry-funded science plus a peer-reviewed system of validating science that is broken. Industry now funds scientific journals, conferences and university research, and independent research is being selected out and censored from debate by government, mainstream media, and other institutions.
What if Governments are lying to you about the dangers of viruses and the benefits of vaccines?
Government COVID-19 vaccination policies are causing sickness and death due to false health information, and it is time for all health professionals and the public to do what is right for humanity and the greater good of society: protect the human right to bodily autonomy.
That is, the right to decide what substances are injected into our own bodies. Vaccines have been sold to the public and doctors on deceptive information and we have now lost trust in our medical profession. They are creating death and sickness in the community with ‘vaccines’/drugs that are promoted to doctors on false health information. This is because doctors’ knowledge is influenced by the pharmaceutical companies that fund their education (Ch 6 of my PhD Thesis).
The adverse events to these drugs come out weeks, months and years after the injections and this is not being discussed or reported by doctors or the mainstream media – Vaccine Injuries UK Documentary (The experiences of vaccine injury of one family in WA and mistreatment by the medical system). It is not even being monitored by the 100% industry-funded Australian government regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administrator (TGA), in long-term studies (5-10 years) of health outcomes of all vaccinated individuals. That is the only way to prove causality for adverse events to the vaccine.
COVID-19 Global ‘Vaccination’ Programs
In all countries hospitalisations and deaths have increased since 2021 when a new untested gene-technology was promoted to the public as a ‘vaccine’ against COVID-19 disease. This was a Phase 3 Clinical Trial – an experiment on the population.
This experimentation on the population was justified by falsely claiming there was a new virus that would harm every person that was exposed to it. A claim that was based on mathematical models not real empirical data and this has now been demonstrated to be false.
Yet this increase in sickness and death in all age-groups in 2021 (as opposed to 2020 where deaths were just in the elderly with co-morbidity) has been attributed by the government to COVID19 disease itself, even though there is a direct dose-response relationship between the COVID-19 ‘vaccination’ rates in 2021-22 and the increased death and hospitalisation rates.
Here are the Australian statistics. And here is a summary article showing how the deaths and hospitalisations rose with the ‘vaccination’ rate from February 2021-22 – National Score Card Fail
How can it be a ‘vaccine’ when governments admit that it does not prevent transmission of the disease in the community, and it is not stopping people dying from COVID-19 disease? The claim that it ‘reduces the symptoms’, is not supported by any evidence particularly as vaccinated people are still dying from this disease, and this criterion makes it a drug not a vaccine.
So, how are governments being permitted to attribute these hospitalisations and deaths to COVID-19 disease when most of these patients with ‘the disease’ have been ‘vaccinated’ and ‘the disease’ may be a result of adverse health outcomes to the vaccine? This is because diagnosis of the disease is being based on a test and not on disease symptoms.
Health departments are misusing the Rapid Antigen Test and insisting that every person that is admitted or treated at a hospital – with or without flu-like symptoms – must have a rapid antigen test.
These tests are not licensed diagnostic tools and there is no proof that the identified ‘virus’ is the cause of the disease. The correct use of these tests is to assist in diagnosis when someone presents with disease symptoms for flu-like illness.
Yet hospitals are using these tests for admission to hospital for all patients, with or without flu-like illness. All positive tests are being labelled as ‘cases of COVID-19 disease.’ This is fraudulent and it is hiding the number of vaccinated patients that are being admitted to hospital with adverse events to the vaccine, but are testing positive to the rapid antigen test.
The identification of a virus in a person when no disease symptoms are present is falsely being labelled a ‘case’ of disease. These should be called sub-clinical infections (or asymptomatic infections) and they are not a risk to the community. A sub-clinical infection means the natural immune system is functioning properly to prevent the symptoms and this will create long-term immunity for the individual and herd immunity in the community.
Most cases of infectious diseases after 1950 did not result in hospitalisation or death in developed countries (polio requires extra discussion to understand how it was politicised) so the ‘risk’ of infectious diseases had been removed before most vaccines were developed.
The pharmaceutical companies are using pseudoscience to falsely claim that the identification of a ‘virus’ makes you a risk to the community and this is to convince you that we need drugs called ‘vaccines’ to control infectious diseases. Vaccines were only a secondary measure brought in after the risk of death and hospitalisations was removed from infectious diseases. Hence, they have always been voluntary.
This is the flaw in the alleged pandemic of 2020 that was based on ‘cases’ of disease (not hospitalisations or deaths) found in healthy people without symptoms due to the misuse and misinterpretation of a test used to screen for just one of many viruses/bacteria/non-infectious agents that cause “flu-like” illness.
The identification of viruses in healthy people is not a useful criterion for predicting health outcomes and it is not proof of causality. Pharmaceutical companies are now influencing medical professionals and governments with this false science on the screening of healthy people for viruses.
If we stop this screening, we will stop the appearance of a ‘pandemic’ that has been based on changes to definitions to suit the vaccination agenda: a goal that is profitable and can be used to monitor and control populations.
Government Childhood Vaccination Programs
Governments have been promoting childhood vaccination policies as ‘health policies’ for decades yet the health of children has significantly declined as the vaccination program expanded. This became obvious after the pharmaceutical industry received indemnity in 1986 for any ‘drug’ that is promoted as a ‘vaccine’.
This was requested because they were paying millions of dollars in compensation for vaccine injuries and deaths that are not reported by the mainstream media.
Did you know that governments do not promote vaccines to the public on the improvements in health that they produce in children or the population in general?
They promote them on the uptake rate of the drug/vaccine in the population. For example, ‘we need a 95% uptake of the vaccine for herd immunity’. People then assume that a high uptake of the drug/vaccine equals better health.
The increase in chronic illnesses in children has occurred in a direct dose-response relationship to the increased use of vaccines over the last 30 years. Did you know that this relationship is a strong indicator of a causal link between vaccine use and chronic illnesses in the population?
The government has never investigated this link to support the claim that ‘vaccines are safe’. Therefore, they tell you it is a ‘coincidence’ after vaccination or they claim, ‘correlation is not causation’. However, both represent a failure of duty of care by the government and neither are based on evidence-based medicine.
Interview with Dr. Judy Wilyman describing the false information that is used to promote vaccines to doctors and the public in government ‘health’ policies designed on industry-funded science.
