Australia’s Fair Work Commission should be independent from the government, but in 2021 it became a tool of the state. This is a situation that has occurred in a similar manner in authoritarian states in the past, including Nazi Germany.
Government capture of the Fair Work Commission has significant implications for our fundamental human rights because it is the primary reason why employee mandates for experimental mRNA gene injections (falsely promoted to the public as ‘COVID vaccines’) could be permitted in 2021.
The action of mandating a medical intervention was contrary to the legislative purpose of the Fair Work Act 2009 which was to prevent discrimination and the use of unlawful practices in the workplace.
But in 2021 the Act was used to create discrimination by requiring employee’s medical information, that is protected under privacy laws, to be revealed to employers and by permitting employers to coerce employees into a medical intervention – vaccination – that was not legally permitted in any workplace contracts in Australia prior to 2021.
The mandating of experimental injections by employers has also happened despite Australia signing and ratifying the Nuremburg Code written in 1947 to prevent this criminal situation.
Whilst the Fair Work Commission was supposed to be independent in 2021 this was compromised by its directive for all judges and employers to support the government’s policy on vaccination for the ‘good of the community’: a similar model was used by the head of the judiciary in Germany in 1942-45.
Support from the judiciary in Australia was solidified by the FWC’s directions to judges that included comments that ensured the judiciary knew they had to rule with the government for the ‘good of the community’.
The following comment used in Nazi Germany shows how this solidarity from judges can be achieved:
“At a time when the best of our people are risking their lives… and… tirelessly working for victory, there can be no place for criminals who destroy the will of the community.”
This situation prevented any citizen from challenging government policy in the courts because judges were informed that the government’s recommendations on vaccines were for the ‘community good’. When the opposite was true.
Mandating any medication in a genetically diverse population will destroy the genetic fabric of the population. Many genes pre-dispose individuals to over 500 chronic illnesses and these genes can remain dormant in a persons’ lifetime if an environmental factor does not switch it on. This is the well-known field of science called epigenetics.
Consequently, medical practitioner’s guidelines require informed consent for every medical intervention they recommend, particularly in healthy people. The use of coercion in medicine is the opposite to health promotion in the community because health outcomes are dependent upon genetics and other environmental factors.
In Australia in 2021, as in 1940 Nazi Germany, a tyranny was established due to the courts, the police and the government working in synchronicity for the ‘community good’.
This ‘group think’ about vaccination was further enhanced by the bullying culture of the media. Journalists used the word ‘antivaxxer’ to denigrate as irresponsible, any citizen who questioned the claim that vaccination was for the ‘good of the community’ or that this untested drug was even a ‘vaccine’. Just ‘follow the science’ authorities said without providing any evidence.
The claim that vaccination is for the ‘good of the community’ is not supported by the principles or ethics of medical practice because genetics pre-determines the health outcomes from drugs/vaccines.