On the 4 April 2020 I published a video titled ‘Social Distancing in Australia is Unnecessary for COVID19‘ (12 Mins). This video explains the fact that a virus is not pathogenic (disease causing) in all countries and therefore the ‘pandemic’ potential of a new virus can only be determined after it has been observed in the environmental and lifestyle conditions of each country. (This video was immediately censored by YouTube. In addition, Facebook had already censored my Vaccination Decisions page).
The suggestion by Bill Gates and the CDC/WHO that you can predict a ‘global pandemic’ in 2020 based on a mathematical model is fraudulent because this suggestion is not based on the science of how viruses cause disease.
Hence, the Australian government calling a ‘pandemic’ when there were no cases of this disease in the country is extremely serious. The Australian government implemented the most extreme measures to address a new influenza virus without establishing the risk of this virus to Australians before doing this.
‘Australia a ‘standout loser’ for damaging economy without COVID-19 immunity’, Nobel prize-winner says (4 May 2020, r/AusFinance)
The Australian environmental/lifestyle and healthcare context is very different to other countries and infectious disease control is never based on data from other countries because of this reason. The data for disease control always needs to be country specific. That is, public health policies cannot be based on generalised data because viruses are more virulent under some environmental and lifestyle conditions than others.
Bill Gates is a main sponsor of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI) that is made up of corporate partnerships that influence global health policies. In 2015 this alliance was influential in the design of the International Health Regulations for the World Health Organisation’s global health agenda.
When countries like Australia declared a ‘pandemic’ in 2020, based on the GAVI/CDC/WHO ‘Predictive Contagion Model’ that wildly exaggerated the deaths to this new influenza virus, they were triggering the GAVI/CDC/WHO’s ‘pandemic blueprint’ that resulted in extreme measures being enacted in all countries despite the reality of their public health situation.
This blueprint of directives was designed by corporate partnerships and not by the government of each country. Governments signed away their sovereignty when they signed up to the WHO’s global agenda and enacted these directives. The problem for Australia is that our government called a pandemic on 21 January (no cases in the country) and the WHO did not assess the risk of this new virus as being a ‘global pandemic’ (based on a flawed mathematical model) until 11 March 2020. Why was our government so eager to “pull this trigger”?
This resulted in huge financial and employment loss for many people as well as the loss of many human rights and freedoms in Australia. These have not been justified by the Australian government and the international community is calling these removal of basic freedoms a crime against the population.
Criminal Actions of the CDC and Governments that are Locking Down Healthy Populations:
1) International Tribunal of Natural Justice (ITNJ) (4th sitting 29 April 2020): Corona Emergency Hearing – Dr. Rashid Buttar and Dr. Judy Mikovits PhD.
2) Butterfly of the Week (27 April 2020): Under House Arrest as a Result of a Crime Committed by the CDC.
Opposing Mandatory Vaccination and Medical Testing of Healthy People in Australia
After my video on social distancing was released the US Surgeon-General, Jerome Adams, who advises the US government on its COVID19 Policy, dumped the GATES/CDC/WHO ‘Predictive Contagion Model‘ (13 April 2020). When doing this he said: “models are predictions when you do not have real data” (at 13.25 mins).
The US Surgeon-General states: “they (these predictions) were people’s best guesses and/or informed by experiences in different cultures in very different places“(at 13.25 mins). This is why a mathematical model using the same criteria for all countries cannot predict a ‘global pandemic of a disease’ and cannot be used to predict a pandemic in any specific country like Australia.
These models wildly exaggerated the deaths to a new mutated influenza virus based on hypothetical data. It is possible the data was collected from countries, such as China and Italy, that have very different environmental conditions to Australia and that both had mandatory flu vaccination programs in place and poor environmental conditions prior to the so called ‘pandemic’ of this new ‘influenza’ disease – COVID19.
On 25 February 2020, Professor Raina MacIntyre, Head of the Australian Biosecurity Program, predicted that “260,000 – 390,000 people would die” from this virus in Australia. This was before she had any knowledge of how transmissible or pathogenic this virus would be in the Australian community.
Did you know that viruses are not pathogenic (disease causing) in most healthy people (99%) in developed countries with good public health conditions? Remember we are exposed to new mutated influenza viruses every year and in most cases they result in asymptomatic or mild self-limiting disease in ~99% of the healthy population. This is why Professor Raina MacIntyre’s prediction of the number of deaths was flawed.
The suggestion that you can predict a ‘global pandemic’ based on a generalised mathematical model is not based on the science of how viruses cause disease in the community. The ‘Predictive Contagion Model’ used by the Gates/CDC/WHO medical-industry complex was flawed because it was not based on scientific evidence.
On the 29 April 2020 this false science was described by Dr. Judy Mikovits PhD in her interview discussing Dr. Fauci’s Darkest Secret and his suppression of scientific research that does not support the medical-industry agenda and the promotion of vaccines.
In Australia, the media uses medical-industry scientists and commentators, such as Peter Doherty, Norman Swan (Australian Skeptics industry-lobby group) and Karl Kruszelnicki (Australian Skeptics industry-lobby group) to promote the corporate message of the need for multiple vaccines and for serology tests for healthy people to participate in society.
The Prime Minister, Scott Morrison, is currently stating that he will not end the lockdown until more people down load the app that will trace our contacts.
This population control is occurring because of a re-classification of diseases in 2020 that enables “flu-like symptoms” to be classified as the disease “COVID-19”. Many of the ‘cases’ of this new disease are being labelled from a clinical diagnosis (symptoms only) not from laboratory confirmation of the new virus.
All of the deaths from COVID19 have co-morbidity and may have other influenza viruses present, but if coronavirus (generic) is present then this is listed as the main cause of death – not the cancer, lung edema, heart disease, or other underlying health issues that would have been listed in previous years.
Are Social Distancing and Lockdowns of the Healthy Population Good Precautionary Measures?
Did you know that Australia became the first country to declare COVID19 a disease of pandemic potential on 21 January 2020 when there were no cases of this disease in Australia? And when there was no knowledge of how transmissible or pathogenic this virus would be in Australian conditions.
The extreme measures, that were introduced without any knowledge of this virus in Australia, are not “good precautionary measures” as the Australian government is claiming because the government has introduced – social distancing, mandatory vaccination, mandatory medical testing and apps to trace our contacts and pass laws – in the healthy population and these measures are not proportionate to the risk of this new virus in our country.
Measures can be stepped up when the actual risk of a virus is assessed and many countries have not used social distancing and lockdowns of the healthy population to control this virus.
This new influenza virus – Novel 2019 Coronavirus (also known as SARSCov2) – was downgraded as a ‘High Consequence Infectious Disease’ by 19 March 2020.
The environmental context of 1918 does not exist in 2020 so it is unlikely that any new mutated influenza virus would cause a pandemic because viruses do not cause disease on their own. They need certain environmental factors such as poor hygiene or toxins to be present in order to be pathogenic (disease causing).
Did you know that the soldiers in 1918 were also given the typhoid vaccine prior to the Spanish flu outbreak? This was in addition to the extremely poor and unhygienic conditions during the war that involved the mass movement of people.
The Gates/CDC/WHO (medical-industry complex) concerns about a ‘global pandemic’ in 2020 are flawed (and orchestrated to sell vaccines) because they are not based on the science of how viruses cause disease in humans.
The Australian government obtained Emergency Powers for a ‘pandemic of a disease’ in Australia on 21 January 2020 without any scientific evidence of the transmission of this virus in Australian conditions. They also called it before the World Health Organisation had used a flawed mathematical Predictive Contagion model to claim it would cause a ‘global pandemic’. This decision was made on 11 March 2020.
Implementing lockdown measures and social distancing in the healthy population is not a precautionary measure to take when there is no real data suggesting that this virus would be a threat in Australia. Australians are exposed to new mutated influenza viruses every year.
Are we going to observe an increase in deaths and illnesses to “flu-like illnesses” (that is, “COVID19” after the mandatory flu vaccination campaign that is occurring in Australia on 1 May 2020?
Here is a liability form that can be used to refuse vaccines that are being forced upon you by employers, schools, and institutions. Please also visit the Know Your Rights website and the Australian Vaccination Network for further information on refusing vaccinations and unnecessary serology tests for healthy people to participate in Australian society.