A direct correlation of harm with the increased use of vaccines (drugs) in the population needs to be invesitgated before a government claims that the combined schedule of vaccines is safe. However, governments have not investigated the combined schedule of vaccines in long-term health studies using an inert placebo.
Instead they are claiming that ‘correlation does not equal causation’ and that reactions after vaccines are given are simply a ‘coincidence’. This is unscientific and they are claiming vaccines are safe by ignoring this plausible cause of the increased chronic illness we are observing in childen. In doing so they are breaching their duty of care to the general public and designing public health policy that will cause death and disability in the human population.
The causality studies for the combined schedule of vaccines have not been done to prove that vaccines are not causing this chronic illness and disability in the population and the direct linear increase in illnesses with the increased use of vaccines is strong evidence for a safety signal that needs investigating.
The science on this website is supported by many doctors and all the science must be included in any public health policy, not selective science, to protect the health of the population. A policy that is not open for debate by the public is indoctrination and not a policy that is based on evidence-based medicine that has been properly scrutinised by all stakeholders – particularly the public on whom it has been enforced .
The suppression of the scientific debate in Australia has led many parents and professionals to investigate the science of vaccines and to set up websites presenting information about the risks of this medical intervention to the public. Links to these websites can be accessed on the Websites describing the Risks of Vaccines .
The Australian government’s vaccination policies have been influenced by the pharmaceutical companies through pharmaceutical donations to the government and lobbying of politicians by industry associated lobby groups – The Australian Medical Association (AMA), The Australian Skeptics Inc and their offshoot Stop the Australian Vaccination Network (SAVN), The Friends of Science and Medicine and the Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA).
The PHAA is the face of the Australian National Immunisation Conference that is run every two years and is funded 100% by industry and the government. It has a conflict of interest in promoting vaccines to the public because of this sponsorship. In 2014 this conference allowed the SAVN lobby group, that operates as a facebook group of consumers (many of whom do not have science or health qualifications) to present a poster that described the strategies they are using to suppress the scientific debate of vaccination in public forums and in the mainstream media in Australia.
Here is a link to the SAVN lobby group poster that was presented at a scientific conference. It is titled “Analysis of the Impact of the Stop the Australian Vaccination Network Campaign on the Public Profile of the Finances of the Australian Vaccination Network (AVN)“ by Alison Gaylard, David Hawkes, Anne Coady, Cate Ryan, Rachael A. Dunlop et al (leaders of the SAVN industry-associated lobby group).
Many of these individuals have used abuse, ridicule and emotional arguments to dismiss and shame academics and professionals that speak about the risks of vaccination in Australia. This abuse of academics and professionals is occuring both in the Australian mainsteam media, on the Conversation website and on social media.
A description of how the medical literature is being selected for vaccination policies in Australia is given in the presentation that I gave at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS), 15 October 2015. This was a vaccination forum organised to discuss the public’s concerns about the government’s new mandatory vaccination legislation that was being implemented on 1 January 2016 in social welfare policies.
The forum was titled Questions and Answers: No Jab No Pay/Play Policy. and all the public health professionals, doctors and government representatives, including the ex-directors of the NCIRS, Peter McIntyre and Robert Booy, declined to attend this forum to explain the necessity for implementing mandatory vaccination legislation in social services policies at a time when infectious diseases were not a serious risk to the majority of Australians.
An policy that is not open for debate by the public is indoctrination and not a policy that is based on evidence-based medicine that has been properly scrutinised. Here is a video of Dr. Kenneth Stoller discussing the cover up of the causal link between vaccines and autism. Here is more scientific information on the vaccine/autism link
Here is an article that describes the corruption and criminality that can occur in the State-Pharmaceutical complex with the intensification of neoliberlaism in health policies. It is titled “Immunity and Impunity: Corruption in the State-Pharma Nexus” by P. Rawlinson, Western Sydney University, Australia.